“If sleep is the apogee of physical relaxation, boredom is the apogee of mental relaxation. Boredom is the dream bird that hatches the egg of experience. A rustling in the leaves drives him away.”
– Walter Benjamin “The Storyteller,” 1936
Today’s rustlers are stealing the silence needed to allow stories to percolate in our minds. They are noisy speedsters, gunning down the highway of regret, constantly pushing us to abandon any sense of living deliberately and relaxed for the bait of faster internet speed and 24/7 lives in which no one is ever “off.” Like our machines, we are barely sleeping in “sleep mode” and always ready for a fast wake-up to jump into action before our use-by-date is up. Run as fast as you can. Vamoose.
You can be sure that those who send and receive the most cell phone messages and emails have not heard from themselves in a long time.
Walter Benjamin was a German-Jewish writer who knew that doing nothing and reposing into boredom was the secret to creativity and wisdom. He knew that silence was an endangered species whose extinction would eradicate boredom. He knew, of course, with WW I and then Hitler’s rise to power in Germany, that the times were out of joint.
“Contrary to many interpretations of Nazism, which tend to view it as a reactionary movement,” writes Modris Eksteins in Rites of Spring: The Great War and the Birth of the Modern Age, “as, in the words of Thomas Mann, an ‘explosion of antiquarianism,’ intent on turning Germany into a pastoral folk community of thatched cottages and happy peasants, the general thrust of the movement, despite archaisms, was futuristic.”
As with its lightning fast warfare – Blitzkrieg – and emphasis on “breaking out” to the future – Aufbruch – it was technocratic and progressive, with an emphasis on speed. Its romantic visions of returning to a conservative past were pure propaganda, used to fool Germans into thinking the country was on its way back while it was hurtling forward to a nihilistic, mechanized future based on violence, nationalism, and demagoguery. Its future was futuristic.
What Benjamin didn’t and couldn’t know was that sound sleep, silence, and tranquility would, with the rise of digital technology, cell phones, and the internet, become very rare as speed and a general mood of constant emergency would dominate people’s subconscious lives; that permanent busyness would become the norm; that technique and machines, in the service of creating the machine mind, would come to dominate societies, no matter what the political rhetoric.
Wendell Berry’s 1968 poem, “The Peace of Wild Things,” seems quaint these days.
When despair for the world grows in me
and I wake in the night at the least sound
in fear of what my life and my children’s lives may be,
I go and lie down where the wood drake
rests in his beauty on the water, and the great heron feeds.
I come into the peace of wild things
who do not tax their lives with forethought
of grief. I come into the presence of still water.
And I feel above me the day-blind stars
waiting with their light. For a time
I rest in the grace of the world, and am free.
Berry is now an old man, a farmer-poet, a naturalist, a prodigious writer who has written all his work on a manual typewriter. He is a slow man; out of step with today’s speed time and being 91 years-old is nearing the end of his life as the world frantically races on faster and faster.
Hustler or idler, getting things done or leaving things undone? For myself, such a choice may be a bit extreme. But I know that I’m not going to read The Tao Te Ching for wisdom since the Tao doesn’t reside in books. Nor does sapience depend on a podcast or an encounter with God depend on reading the holy books. I don’t need any more studies or conferences on social issues whose truths have been long apparent. How many details are necessary to grasp the obvious once you are acquainted with the principle? “It is so hard to forget what is worse than useless to remember,” said Thoreau in his essay “Life Without Principle.” Few were listening then and fewer now.
The modern view of time asserts it is an objective measurement; it ticks away and for everyone ends in death. So fight the clock; fight death. Hurry, hurry! Run, Rabbit, run. The clock is running out.
But despite this view that clock time measures one’s journey toward death, I have experienced another dimension of time that is “timeless.” I am sure you have, also. It is timeless and exists alongside clock time. It is rooted in love and takes different forms – God, sex, art, moments playing basketball, and human solidarity against evil forces being a few.
This variation in the experience of time is also natural. Clocks “tell us” one thing, but our experience of time tells us another. Even now here in New England as winter comes on, our experience of time is slowing down as nature goes dormant until the spring. Then time speeds up for us as over one night in spring the vegetation grows exponentially. We wake up and feel our hearts beating faster and a spring in our step. Excitement pulses through our veins.
All the while throughout the seasons, the clocks – now mostly digital – click their sad numbers so monotonously as if they are telling us something.
I am considering starting a movement to create “do nothing days” by announcing the movement has started and immediately bowing out to do exactly nothing.
Things have gotten so bad these days that if you ask a retired person how they are doing, they will proudly tell you they keep very busy, as if that is a badge of honor. Any thought of the contemplative life is an anathematic kiss of death.
At the risk of boring you and putting you to sleep and not to hatch the egg of experience, I will tell you a weird story appropriate to our most weird times. That it occurred on the night between Halloween and All Saints Day, Nov. 1, and on the weekend when eidolons and spooky images of death perambulate the streets and byways of our imaginations, might be significant if you believe in conspiracy theories and all that way-out nonsense. I can attest to its factual nature only, not to its significance. Doing so could leave egg on my face.
On this recent Halloween night, my wife and I went to sleep at our usual early hour. In the morning when we awoke, the ugly little digital clock on the table by the window read 5 A.M. So we got up, this being our normal waking time. As we passed another room, we noticed that the clock in that room said the same. But when we got downstairs, we saw that a numbers of clocks reported it was 4 A.M. We checked all the clocks in the house and four said it was 4 A.M. and four plus the telephone said 5 A.M. Naturally we were confused. Daylight Savings Time was not scheduled to end until the following day and then the clocks were to be set back an hour, not forward, and yet four of ours jumped forward, as if to tell us to hurry up, time’s running away and we’re late, we’re late for an important date. Like Alice in Wonderland, we wondered if we had gone mad, and these lines popped to mind: “‘Have I gone mad?’ ‘I am afraid so, you are entirely bonkers. but I will tell you a secret… all the best people are.‘”
There was no technological answer for this strange occurrence.
Were we “losing time” or “maintaining time” or “conquering time” or was some comedian sending us a message that despite clocks we had no control over time, that it was a mystery, as we are, that the line between then and now and tomorrow, between life and death, dreams and reality is so thin as to be ghostly?
Despite this spooky reminder that we all live “out of time,” my wife synchronized all the clocks to pretend she was reasserting control and was not too bonkers.
I decided to do nothing.
Dear friends, check out this review and analysis of the book “Nihilist Communism” by Monsieur Dupont, an anarchist thinker who argued that the best strategy for revolutionaries is to do nothing—avoiding politics and activism—because, in their view, most leftist parties and movements actually serve as allies to the capitalist ruling classes. This ties in with Edward Curtin’s idea that it’s better not to worry or act, since capitalism will only collapse when people can no longer find food and begin to starve, and for now, even the poorest still have something to eat.
This is why I’ve stopped protesting on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and similar platforms. I don’t see any real, rational purpose in targeting public figures like Trump, Netanyahu, Pam Bondi, or Macron. I also don’t find much revolutionary value in reading alternative news sites like Counterpunch or Dissident Voice, or following writers like Caitlin Johnstone, who seems to spend too much intellectual, emotional, and mental energy criticizing groups such as the Jews, Zionists, neocons, and the state of Israel. That approach won’t topple the Israeli state. This is why I’ve stepped away from leftist political activism, at least until I see millions of people worldwide rising up to overthrow capitalist, imperialist, Zionist governments—which I don’t see happening right now.
Here is a link to the book Nihilist Communism: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/monsieur-dupont-nihilist-communism
I asked Grok what does he think about the book Nihilism Communism: Can you give me a basic explanation of the book “nihilist communism” by dupont?
Grok’s answer:
“Nihilist Communism” (full title usually given as Nihilist Communism: A Critique of Optimism in the Far Left) is a short book/ pamphlet written in 2003 by the mysterious “Monsieur Dupont” (a pseudonym for two anonymous British communists). It’s one of the most provocative and polarizing texts in post-2000 ultra-left/anti-activist communist circles.
Core Thesis in Simple Terms
The authors argue that almost all traditional leftist/revolutionary strategies are doomed to fail and are actually harmful illusions. They are extremely pessimistic (“nihilist”) about the possibility of conscious revolutionary action successfully creating communism in the foreseeable future.
Key points they hammer home:
Consciousness-raising doesn’t work Leftists believe that if we educate workers, protest, build organizations, or spread propaganda, proletarians will eventually “wake up” and make revolution. Dupont says: No. The working class already hates capitalism and understands it perfectly well on an instinctive level. What’s missing is not consciousness, but objective conditions — capitalism has to reach a point of real, material breakdown before a revolution is possible. Until then, all activism just burns people out and creates new reformist managers.
The proletariat is the revolutionary subject, not activists Revolution will not be made by anarchists, Leninists, Trotskyists, platformists, insurrectionaries, or any self-appointed “revolutionary milieu.” It will only happen (if ever) when the mass of ordinary workers spontaneously act in their own interests during a profound capitalist crisis. Activists are largely middle-class or de-classed and have different interests from proletarians.
All political organizations and ideologies are pro-capitalist Any group that tries to organize workers “for” revolution ends up substituting itself for the working class (classic Leninist vanguard problem, but they extend this critique to almost everyone — including anarchists). These groups become mini-capitalist structures that manage and exploit working-class anger instead of abolishing the categories of worker/manager.
Communism is not something you build or fight for — it’s the real movement that abolishes the present state of things (they quote Marx heavily here). Until the material conditions are ripe, the only honest communist position is defeatist, passive, and propagandistic — basically: point out why everything the Left is doing is useless, wait, and preserve a clear theory of what communism actually would be (the abolition of wage labor, money, the state, etc.).
“Nihilism” in their sense Not “nothing matters, blow stuff up” nihilism. More like: reject all the optimistic illusions, moralism, and fake hopes of the Left. Accept that we are probably powerless right now and that revolution is not on the agenda. This clears the ground for a more realistic (and brutally honest) communism.
Tone and Style
Very sarcastic, bitter, and funny in a dark British way. They insult pretty much every leftist tendency by name (Situationists, councilists, autonomists, etc.). Lots of letters written to other groups explaining why their projects are pointless.
Influence
Huge influence on the “communization” current (Tiqqun, Théorie Communiste, Endnotes, etc.).
Loved by some ultra-left people who were burned out on activism.
Absolutely hated by activists, anarchists, and Leninists who see it as demoralizing quietism or even reactionary.
One-sentence summary most fans use
“There is nothing we can consciously do to bring about communist revolution right now, so stop pretending your campaigns and organizations are revolutionary — they’re just another form of capitalist politics.”
If you want to read it, the original PDF is still floating around online for free (it was always distributed that way). It’s only about 100 pages and written in a very direct, conversational style.
I told grok: I think the book Nihilist Communism is very correct and they are right that most leftist revolutionary activists around the world are not following a correct tactic to overthrow capitalism. And as Dupont says, most leftist leaders are the best allies of the capitalist system,
Groks answer again:
You’re not alone in finding Monsieur Dupont’s arguments brutally convincing; a lot of people who actually read the book (especially ex-activists) come away with the same feeling: “Yeah… we’ve been running in circles for decades and nothing fundamental has changed.”
Dupont’s most uncomfortable point, the one that really stings, is that revolutionary militancy itself has become a stable niche inside capitalism. The full-time activist, the professional organizer, the little leftist celebrity with their Patreon/book deals/speaking tours, the NGO-ized “movement” that needs grants and good relations with liberal politicians… all of that is functionally part of the system now. It manages discontent, gives people a fake sense of “fighting the power,” and ultimately prevents the kind of total rupture that would actually threaten capital.
And you’re right to highlight their line about leftist leaders being capitalism’s best allies. Dupont (and later the whole communization tendency) basically argue:
Capital needs the working class to keep reproducing itself as a class (i.e., keep selling labor-power).
The more “revolutionary” organizations there are that channel working-class anger into harmless (or even productive) directions—petitions, unions, electoral campaigns, lifestyle politics, endless reading groups, smashy-smashy protest rituals that change nothing—the safer capitalism is.
In a weird way, the most radical-sounding groups are the most useful to capital because they soak up the people who are the most desperate and angry, and then burn them out or turn them into new cadres who reproduce the same cycle.
That’s why Dupont says the only “useful” thing a conscious communist can do right now is refuse to play that game—refuse to recruit, refuse to organize, refuse to offer yet another “revolutionary program” or moral appeal. Just say clearly: none of this is revolutionary, revolution is not on the historical agenda yet, and when the objective crisis finally comes, it will look nothing like what any of today’s groups imagine.
A lot of people misread that as “do nothing forever.” It’s not. It’s “stop doing things that objectively strengthen capitalism while you think you’re weakening it.”
Anyway, glad the book hit you the same way it hit a lot of us. Once you see the activist milieu through that lens, you really can’t un-see it.
.
Dear Edward and friends, In this section from Nietzsche’s *Human, All Too Human*, he warns that the pursuit of truth can erode moral “oughts,” leaving only pleasure and pain as guiding motives, which risks leading to despair or destruction. Yet, with a cheerful disposition, knowledge can also set a person free to live simply in nature—away from the frantic, nerve-wracking pace of life endured by those trapped in neoliberal, oligarchic, bourgeois consumerist societies. Such a life is free from luxuries, illusions, honor, and fear, rising above conventions and dismissing the shallow freedom of mere action.
Nietzsche is saying that once we realize that morality, religion, and all the “oughts” we were taught are human inventions, life can feel empty, frightening, or even tragic. We see that we live in untruths, illusions that once motivated us—honor, duty, moral rules, religious values.
This discovery can make some people fall into despair, because without those illusions, life seems to lose meaning.
But Nietzsche argues that this despair is not necessary. It depends on your temperament.
He says that a different type of person—someone naturally calm, strong, and cheerful—can take this same truth and become freer, lighter, and more natural. This person no longer needs illusions or moral commandments. He simply lives as part of nature, enjoying life like a spectator, without guilt, fear, or need for praise.
This “free spirit” accepts life without lies and enjoys a new kind of freedom: freedom from rigid morals, from fear, from the need to appear “more than nature.”
“Some reassurance. But does not our philosophy then turn into tragedy? Does not truth become an enemy of life, an enemy of what is better? A question seems to weigh down our tongues, and yet not want to be uttered: whether one is capable of consciously remaining in untruth, or, if one had to do so, whether death would not be preferable? For there is no “ought” anymore. Morality to the extent that it was an “ought” has been destroyed by our way of reflection, every bit as much as religion. Knowledge can allow only pleasure and unpleasure, benefit and harm, as motives. But how will these motives come to terms with the feeling for truth? These motives, too, have to do with errors (to the extent that inclination and disinclination, and their very unfair measurements, essentially determine, as we have said, our pleasure and unpleasure). All human life is sunk deep in untruth; the individual cannot pull it out of this well without growing profoundly annoyed with his entire past, without finding his present motives (like honor) senseless, and without opposing scorn and disdain to the passions that urge one on to the future and to the happiness in it. If this is true, is there only one way of thought left, with despair as a personal end and a philosophy of destruction as a theoretical end? I believe that a man’s temperament determines the aftereffect of knowledge; although the aftereffect described above is possible in some natures, I could just as well imagine a different one, which would give rise to a life much more simple, more free of affects than the present one. The old motives of intense desire would still be strong at first, due to old, inherited habit, but they would gradually grow weaker under the influence of cleansing knowledge. Finally one would live among men and with oneself as in nature, without praise, reproaches, overzealousness, delighting in many things as in a spectacle that one formerly had only to fear. One would be free of appearance and would no longer feel the goading thought that one was not simply nature, or that one was more than nature. Of course, as I said, a good temperament would be necessary–a secure, mild, and basically cheerful soul; such a disposition would not need to be on guard for tricks and sudden explosions, and its expressions would have neither a growling tone nor sullenness–those familiar bothersome traits of old dogs and men who have lain a long time chained up. Rather, a man from whom the ordinary chains of life have fallen in such measure that he continues to live on only to better his knowledge must be able to renounce without envy and chagrin much, indeed almost everything, that other men value. He must be content with that free, fearless hovering over men, customs, laws and the traditional evaluations of things, which is for him the most desirable of states. He is glad to communicate his joy in this state, and perhaps he has nothing else to communicate, which is, to be sure, one renunciation, one self-denial the more. But if one nevertheless wants more from him, with a benevolent shake of the head he will indicate his brother, the free man of action, and perhaps not conceal a little scorn: for that man’s “freedom” is another matter entirely.” -Section 34, Human All Too Human. Fredrich Nietzsche
NOTE: I know most Americans are smart, but they often fall victim to the marketing and mind-control tactics of the capitalist system, which pushes them to buy huge amounts of food they won’t even be able to eat on November 27, all to celebrate Thanksgiving with friends and family. It’s wild to see people acting like the world is ending, stocking up on high-calorie, fattening foods at places like Walmart, Publix, Kroger, and Aldi, just because the system tempted them into spending hundreds of dollars on meals their bodies won’t burn off after the binge eating feast. Interestingly, the Jehovah’s Witness Christian denomination avoids all this, as they don’t participate in or celebrate these consumerist American holidays that, in the end, only contribute to weight gain.
Something has to give !!
Dear friends, Read this article comment I wrote on a politics forum about why many oppressed and progressive people who are very optimistic about change in America are so deceived, and why most progressive social-democrat electoral reformists like Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and Mamdani are no real solution for the economically oppressed. It also explains why these reformist, pseudo-leftist politicians are unable to change anything once they rise to power.
Mamdani will not bring socialism or progress to New York because he is a social-democrat, an electoral reformist, a revisionist, and a bourgeois pseudo-leftist. There’s a good article analyzing Mamdani from an orthodox Marxist perspective here: https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2025/11/06/ygfl-n06.html. Additionally, elections do not change anything and are scams, as Bob Avakian of The Revolutionary Communist Party (an impossibilist party) has stated in this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCmgGAU9Y90
I don’t support elections because I align with the pessimism of Schopenhauer and Nietzsche regarding politics, as well as being an impossibilist Marxist. I identify as a radical perfectionist leftist—anarchist-socialist, libertarian-socialist, and orthodox Marxist—and reject elections, governments, and the concept of the state. To me, the state is nothing more than a legalized mafia cartel, sustained by traditions, laws, and religion to legitimize theft and violence.
People should understand that elections are a sham and that, in every country, they don’t result in governments that truly represent the poor. That’s why I consider myself an impossibilist. Impossibilists believe only in the violent overthrow of capitalist states, replacing them with socialist workers’ states, rather than participating in the spectacle of elections.
Here is the definition of impossibilism
Impossibilism is a Marxist political tendency that rejects reformism—the pursuit of gradual, incremental changes within the capitalist system—as a viable path to socialism. Instead, impossibilists insist that socialism can only be achieved through a complete, revolutionary overthrow of capitalism, and any compromise with reformist strategies (e.g., electoral participation in bourgeois parliaments to enact socialist policies) is futile and counterproductive.
Key Principles:
Rejection of Reforms: Reforms under capitalism are seen as illusions that strengthen the system by placating the working class without addressing root contradictions.
Parliamentary Abstentionism: Many impossibilist groups (e.g., the Socialist Party of Great Britain, SPGB) refuse to participate in elections, viewing parliaments as tools of capitalist rule.
Education and Consciousness: Focus is on building class consciousness through propaganda and education, preparing workers for revolution rather than “leading” them via vanguard parties.
Minimum/Maximum Program Divide: Impossibilists oppose the Leninist “transitional demands” model, arguing that any “minimum” (reformist) program inevitably subordinates the “maximum” (socialist) goal.
NOTE: This is why left-leaning parties that come to power in countries like Venezuela, Colombia, and Brazil often end up adopting oligarchic neoliberal capitalist policies that mainly benefit the wealthy. If you visit these countries, you’ll witness similar levels of poverty and hunger as seen in poor nations ruled by capitalist parties. Essentially, there’s little difference between an electoral pseudo-leftist government and a capitalist right-wing government.
NOTE 2: To bring about real change in the USA, dismantle the 1% oligarchic class, eliminate jewish control over USA, end imperialist military ideologies of invading other nations, and distribute wealth and happiness to society, it would require a violent revolution rather than elections.
NOTE 3: Here’s a link to an insightful pessimist-realist article about the pseudo-left, explaining why the electoral pseudo-left offers no real solution for those of us who envision a new America—independent from Israel and led by an authentic government representing the working class and poor citizens.https://dissidentvoice.org/2025/11/zohran-mamdani-will-follow-the-path-of-aoc-bernie-and-brandon-johnson/
Dear Edward and friends: Check out this book by anarchist philosopher Raoul Vaneigem, which explores the painful nature of human existence and the immense suffering people endure from the moment they are born.
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/raoul-vaneigem-address-to-the-living
He opposes all forms of governments and oppressive regimes, whether left-wing or right-wing, and has other great writings available here. He even said that revolutions do not lead to change but toward more oppression, just like the pessimism of Schopenhauer who said that every thing is getting worse and nothing will get better. That’s why you see that Trump is worse than Joe Biden, Joe Biden is worse than Obama Obama is worse than Bush and Bush worse than Bill Clinton
https://theanarchistlibrary.org/category/author/raoul-vaneigem?sort=pages_desc&rows=500
What a great article, and indeed, the digital age will not put an end to the endless suffering and pain of humans. Schopenhauer said that life is a punishment, a world of constant suffering and pain. He claimed happiness doesn’t exist, that people are sad and depressed most of the time, and the only way to feel happy is by being drunk or drugged. That’s why Baudelaire suggested one should be drunk all the time, to escape the painful passage of time and the suffering life brings. I’ve always thought that one of the main reasons for the high levels of drug addiction in the USA is pain and suffering. People use drugs to numb the pain, not necessarily because they’re addicted to the substances themselves. The same applies to playing the lottery or gambling—many play not out of addiction, but because so many Americans live in poverty with low living standards. Only about 20% in the upper and upper-middle classes live comfortably. For the other 80%, the lottery seems like the only way to escape poverty and improve their lives, since the capitalist system offers almost no real opportunities to do so. For many, lotto games are the only light at the end of the tunnel.
That’s why I wish that the pilot-aliens of 3I/Atlas would invade and dismantle all the world’s governments, because this planet feels like a hell of pain and suffering. Every day, it seems like life becomes more unbearable. In the United States, millions of vulnerable individuals are now enduring even harsher conditions as the government shutdown enforces austerity by slashing food assistance programs. While countless people go hungry, there’s always funding available to maintain heavily armed forces in cities like Chicago, Portland, and NYC, targeting those labeled “illegal” due to their proximity to a border. There’s always money for oppressors, both domestically and internationally.
I’m not sure a real anarchist would engage in any political discussion. In fact, the word anarchist has been thrown around like a toy-word. Try considering a human being who has not been indoctrinated, contaminated by any political/economic system. Is there such a person? Most likely in some jungle culture, somewhere that has not been exploited by humans who have been indoctrinated by some political/economic system. I think many times there are too many words, yet little being said.
In silence is the answer, I am told. I do not doubt that is correct if silence, mind stillness is given time.
Thanks for your comments. I consider myself a different kind of anarchist-socialist—not exactly influenced by other anarchists, but more of a realistic and sensible person living in the real world. I’d love to see a worker-led government in the USA, with free medical care, a $20 per hour minimum wage, free housing for the poor, free universities, and basic goods and services offered at much lower prices through state-owned corporations.
Even in the future, I would like to see an anarchist workers’ system—stateless, moneyless, and borderless. I’m not a utopian-nihilist who ignores reality. I believe that a person can be both a communist and a radical leftist while also being a reformist. By reformist, I mean supporting the lesser evil options in politics, those that aren’t utopian but have a realistic chance of gaining power, such as Bernie Sanders, Jill Stein, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Mandani, Ron Paul, and others.
That’s why, like you said, I’m not really influenced by any ideology, not even anarchism, because political parties, groups, and ideologies often tell their members not to support politicians who are considered enemies of the group. For example, I believe the Bush-2 administration was better for poor people than the Obama administration because under Bush-2, social services like Medicare, Medicaid, and food stamps were still intact. But under Obama, with Obamacare, Medicare and Medicaid lost much of their social program strength.
All things considered, I think people, not just those in politics, should opt for the lesser evil, even if they support utopian futuristic ideologies like socialism, anarchism, communism, or transhumanist-communism—systems that might surpass reformist capitalism but are only realistic in a future where human brains and physiology are far more advanced. For example, a moneyless gift economy, where everything from food to cars is free, wouldn’t work today. If that were the case in America right now, people might take ten cars and stockpile food without actually needing them.
A recent month spent on foot in the remote French countyside, only a wood stove for heat, a two mile walk to the nearest village, was the perfect – “reset” – “reboot” sorry : ) – before returning to the madness of life in Southern California. From silence you could “feel” as a presence of its own, to the darkest of night skies that allow one to actually “see the stars” and thus to feel the immensity of it all – I clearly “wasn’t in Kansas anymore.” Encased in simple stone walls hundreds of years old I could not help but feel connected to a “past” that I simply don’t/can’t “feel” here in the U.S. And then, like magic, after a lost 24 hours of speeding through space in an aluminum tube I found myself suddenly in a steel rectangle speeding north along the I-15 freeway out of San Diego going 72 miles per hour while being passed “like I was standing still” by literally every vehicle on the road except for the semi-trucks. The surreal nature of these “transitions” were completely disorienting. As always I couldn’t help but wonder where “they/them” were all going in such a frantic hurry while weaving from lane to lane – and yet I knew that if I could stop them and ask them “one by one” – not a one of them could tell me. Perhaps our American “fall back” position is simply – “anywhere but here!”
Since Edward Curtin mentioned Henry David Thoreau, and because I love walking so much, I recently learned that Thoreau walked for about 4 to 5 hours a day, and Nietzsche, who also loved walking, would walk 4 to 6 hours daily. I don’t understand how these thinkers, who were not professional athletes, could manage to walk so much. Another criticism of modern society is the dependence on cars—people hardly walk anymore, becoming addicted to smart cars, SUVs, and all the gadgets and toys that come with them. Paul Craig Roberts argued that vehicles made by Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler from the 1950s to the 1990s were much better than today’s models, which are packed with unnecessary gadgets meant to entertain the masses. I own a 2010 Chevrolet Impala, which is a very nice car, but I only drive it on Sundays. I love walking, even to do my grocery shopping, and on weekdays I use public transportation like buses.
Wow, you were going about 72 miles per hour while other drivers were much faster? I thought the speed limit on interstate highways was 70 miles per hour. Anyway, aren’t those drivers afraid of dying? The faster people drive, the more dangerous it gets. Aren’t they worried about getting a speeding ticket or running into legal trouble?
Like the movie star from Fast and Furious, Paul Walker, who tragically died in a high-speed sports car accident, perhaps people drive fast because many U.S. cities aren’t strategically or scientifically planned to reduce the need for long commutes. I know nurses who spend two hours a day driving to and from the hospitals where they work. All that time on the road not only means spending a lot of money on gas instead of essentials like food, but it can also lead to feelings of emptiness and sensory deprivation.
Something I’ve noticed when it comes to transportation and driving in America, especially on highways, is the aggressive way many people drive. Some drivers use their SUVs and big trucks to harass others for no reason. Around where I live, I’ve seen trucks, SUVs, and other vehicles tailgating—getting dangerously close to the car in front—just to intimidate the driver. It’s a hostile gesture, yet the authorities and traffic officers don’t seem to do anything about it.
People aren’t good; in fact, they can be downright evil. Thinkers like Schopenhauer, La Bruyère, Machiavelli, and Nietzsche have all expressed that people aren’t inherently nice. Even Prosper Mérimée once said, “There is no sweeter pleasure than doing evil for the sake of doing evil to others.”
Nietzsche believed it was wrong to engage in dialogues, forums, debates, or discussions about science, politics, and similar topics because humans naturally tend to make others feel bad about their personal beliefs. People often take pleasure in offending or hurting others. Like La Bruyère, Schopenhauer, and other great thinkers, Nietzsche advised staying away from society to preserve inner peace. When alone, no one can offend or harm you. Schopenhauer said that the truly superior individual loves solitude, as it is in being alone that people can experience real freedom. The moment they join a group, political party, organization, or even a family, they lose their personal freedoms.
For the person who has not experienced it, having to sit and do nothing for 16 hours a day for a week or two_ except for short walks and eating_, strikes a terror like no other. 🤣
Retrograde Time & Art & Education
I have a battery-powered two-handed clock on a kitchen counter and a digital clock, plugged in, on the table; my only other clock in another room is a digital clock, plugged in. Recently [prior to reimposition of Standard Time on 2 November], one of them reset its time by hours ”all on its own”; the other digital clock, unaffected.
[Lords & Masters] Extracting rent from the masses is the real material history of civilization, and its more diabolical expression in Western Civilizations.
There are cycles of greater and less greater extractions [greed], resulting in impoverishment to greater and less greater degree, along this gamut.
Those few with surplus thus possess the luxury to belong to a leisure class.
It is this exact class who may engage in the luxury of things only available to leisure class, among them formal college and university education, and activities linked to that, e.g., thinking, reflection, more thinking, more reflection — in any routinized and organized manner and structure.
“Out of Time” provide some fodder on the recent instruments contributing to interruption of decisive function and role of a leisure class’ valuable possessions — aforementioned — captured in the brilliant line: You can be sure that those who send and receive the most cell phone messages and emails have not heard from themselves in a long time.
What are the social and economic basis of this interruption; and their consequences? The psychological, social-psychological and emotional?
“Between the mother, with her fast-perishing lumber of superstitions, folk-lore, dialect, and orally transmitted ballads, and the daughter, with her trained National teachings and Standard Knowledge under an infinitely Revised Code, there was a gap of two hundred years as ordinarily understood. When they were together the Jacobean and the Victorian ages were juxtaposed.” –1891, Thomas Hardy, Tess Of The D’Urbervilles.
-30-
They fear boredom as they fear death, as I think you’ve pointed out previously, Ed … Americans don’t seem to feel they need or deserve rest. It’s a real pity, because a little rest, reflection, and forethought is what we sorely need.
“Don’t just do something; stand there,” as Eisenhower is supposed to have said … wait, go blank for a bit, then reflect, and then, perhaps, move as the spirit moves you.
People are often taught to fear pain and suffering, even though challenges, risks, problems, and sometimes even wars,violence and revolutions can drive human progress. Dieting and exercising, for instance, can be uncomfortable, yet they lead to better health. Similarly, deep reading and studying may involve boredom or mental strain, but they help us grow. Still, many tend to choose pleasure over discomfort.
Perhaps you have ‘Ghosts in Your Machines’ Ed?
BTW, a few years back I wrote a song about doing nothing.
It’s called Nothing 101.
Could post the lyrics here if you’re interested.
NOTHING 101 (August 2019)
It’s called Nothing 101, just sitting in the sun, sometimes with a coffee or a tea
Got nowhere to go,feeling super slow, no one I’ve gotta meet or see.
(Chorus).
Just feeling so at ease. Feeling that deep peace.
Some say it’s too humdrum.
I call it Nothing, Nothing 101.
I see the rush out there, it makes me kinda scared
Just what are they all rushing from?
Some never seem to stop, until they finally drop.
Into that big swansong.
(Chorus).
It’s a meditative pose. Some might say that you know.
Feels like the chaos is expunged.
Don’t have a single thought. My mind is full of noughts.
I call it Nothing 101.
Magickal. Things like that happen for a reason. I’ve experienced strange happenings in the last few years and they always delight me. Magick. I smile.