This article was first published on February 21, 2017, one month after Donald Trump was sworn in as president, more than two-and-a half years ago. What was true then is even truer now, and so I am reprinting it with this brief introduction since I think it describes what is happening in plain sight today.
Now that years of Russia-gate accusations have finally fallen apart, those forces intent on driving Trump from office have had to find another pretext. Now it is Ukraine-gate, an issue similar in many ways to Russia-gate in that both were set into motion by the same forces aligned with the Democratic Party and the CIA-led Obama administration.
It was the Obama administration who engineered the 2014 right-wing, Neo-Nazi coup in Ukraine as part of its agenda to undermine Russia. A neo-liberal/neo-conservative agenda. This is, or should be, common knowledge. Obama put it in his typically slick way in a 2015 interview with CNN’s Fareed Zakiria, saying that the United States “had brokered a deal to transition power in Ukraine.”
This is Orwellian language at its finest, from a warmonger who received the Nobel Prize for Peace while declaring he was in support of war. That the forces that have initiated a new and highly dangerous Cold War, a nuclear confrontation with Russia, demonized Vladimir Putin, and have overthrown the elected leader of a country allied with Russia on its western border, dares from the day he was elected in 2016 to remove its own president in the most obvious ways imaginable seems like bad fiction. But it is fact, and the fact that so many Americans approve of it is even more fantastic.
Over the past few years the public has heard even more about the so-called “deep state,” only to see its methods of propaganda become even more perversely cynical in their shallowness. No one needs to support the vile Trump to understand that the United States is undergoing a fundamental shift wherein tens of millions of Americans who say they believe in democracy support the activities of gangsters who operate out in the open with their efforts to oust an elected president.
We have crossed the Rubicon and there will be no going back.
“In irony a man annihilates what he posits within one and the same act; he leads us to believe in order not to be believed; he affirms to deny and denies to affirm; he creates a positive object but it has no being other than its nothingness.” Jean-Paul Sartre
It is well known that the United States is infamous for engineering coups against democratically elected governments worldwide. Voters’ preferences are considered beside the point. Iran and Mosaddegh in 1953, Arbenz in Guatemala in 1954, Indonesia and Sukarno in 1965-7, Allende in Chile in 1973, to name a few from the relatively distant past. Recently the Obama administration worked their handiwork in Honduras and Ukraine. It would not be hyperbolic to say that overthrowing democratic governments is as American as apple pie. It’s our “democratic” tradition – like waging war.
What is less well known is that elements within the U.S. ruling power elites have also overthrown democratically elected governments in the United States. One U.S. president, John F. Kennedy, was assassinated because he had turned toward peace and opposed the forces of war within his own government. He is the lone example of a president who therefore was opposed by all the forces of imperial conquest within the ruling elites.
Others, despite their backing for the elite deep state’s imperial wars, were taken out for various reasons by competing factions within the shadow government. Nixon waged the war against Vietnam for so long on behalf of the military-industrial complex, but he was still taken down by the CIA, contrary to popular mythology about Watergate. Jimmy Carter was front man for the Tri-Lateral Commission’s deep-state faction, but was removed by the group represented by George H. Bush, William Casey, and Reagan through their traitorous actions involving the Iran hostages. The emcee for the neo-liberal agenda, Bill Clinton, was rendered politically impotent via the Lewinsky affair, a matter never fully investigated by any media.
Obama, CIA groomed, was smoothly moved into power by the faction that felt Bush needed to be succeeded by a slick smiling assassin who symbolized “diversity,” could speak well, and played hoops. Hit them with the right hand; hit them with the left. Same coin: Take your pick – heads or tails. Hillary Clinton was expected to complete the trinity.
But surprises happen, and now we have Trump, who is suffering the same fate – albeit at an exponentially faster rate – as his predecessors that failed to follow the complete script. The day after his surprise election, the interlocking circles of power that run the show in sun and shadows – what C. Wright Mills long ago termed the Power Elite – met to overthrow him, or at least to render him more controllable. These efforts, run out of interconnected power centers, including the liberal corporate legal boardrooms that were the backers of Obama and Hillary Clinton, had no compunction in planning the overthrow of a legally elected president. Soon they were joined by their conservative conspirators in doing the necessary work of “democracy” – making certain that only one of their hand-picked and anointed henchmen was at the helm of state. Of course, the intelligence agencies coordinated their efforts and their media scribes wrote the cover stories. The pink Pussyhats took to the streets. The deep state was working overtime.
Trump, probably never having expected to win and as shocked as most people when he did, made some crucial mistakes before the election and before taking office. Some of those mistakes have continued since his inauguration. Not his derogatory remarks about minorities, immigrants, or women. Not his promise to cut corporate taxes, support energy companies, oppose strict environmental standards. Not his slogan to “make America great again.” Not his promise to build a “wall” along the Mexican border and make Mexico pay for it. Not his vow to deport immigrants. Not his anti-Muslim pledges. Not his insistence that NATO countries contribute more to NATO’s “defense” of their own countries. Not even his crude rantings and Tweets and his hypersensitive defensiveness. Not his reality-TV celebrity status, his eponymous golden tower and palatial hotels and sundry real estate holdings. Not his orange hair and often comical and disturbing demeanor, accentuated by his off the cuff speaking style. Surely not his massive wealth.
While much of this was viewed with dismay, it was generally acceptable to the power elites who transcend party lines and run the country. Offensive to hysterical liberal Democrats and traditional Republicans, all this about Trump could be tolerated, if only he would cooperate on the key issue.
Trump’s fatal mistake was saying that he wanted to get along with Russia, that Putin was a good leader, and that he wanted to end the war against Syria and pull the U.S. back from foreign wars. This was verboten. And when he said nuclear war was absurd and would only result in nuclear conflagration, he had crossed the Rubicon. That sealed his fate. Misogyny, racism, support for Republican conservative positions on a host of issues – all fine. Opposing foreign wars, especially with Russia – not fine.
Now we have a reality-TV president and a reality-TV coup d’etat in prime time. Hidden in plain sight, the deep-state has gone shallow. What was once covert is now overt. Once it was necessary to blame a coup on a secretive “crazy lone assassin,” Lee Harvey Oswald. But in this “post-modern” society of the spectacle, the manifest is latent; the obvious, non-obvious; what you see you don’t see. Everyone knows those reality-TV shows aren’t real, right? It may seem like it is a coup against Trump in plain sight, but these shows are tricky, aren’t they? He’s the TV guy. He runs the show. He’s the sorcerer’s apprentice. He wants you to believe in the illusion of the obvious. He’s the master media manipulator. You see it but don’t believe it because you are so astute, while he is so blatant. He’s brought it upon himself. He’s bringing himself down. Everyone who knows, knows that.
I am reminded of being in a movie theatre in 1998, watching The Truman Show, about a guy who slowly “discovers” that he has been living in the bubble of a television show his whole life. At the end of the film he makes his “escape” through a door in the constructed dome that is the studio set. The liberal audience in a very liberal town stood up and applauded Truman’s dash to freedom. I was startled since I had never before heard an audience applaud in a movie theatre – and a standing ovation at that. I wondered what they were applauding. I quickly realized they were applauding themselves, their knowingness, their insider astuteness that Truman had finally caught on to what they already thought they knew. Now he would be free like they were. They couldn’t be taken in; now he couldn’t. Except, of course, they were applauding an illusion, a film about being trapped in a reality-TV world, a world in which they stood in that theatre – their world, their frame. Frames within frames. Truman escapes from one fake frame into another – the movie. The joke was on them. The film had done its magic as its obvious content concealed its deeper truth: the spectator and the spectacle were wed. McLuhan was here right: the medium was the message.
This is what George Trow in 1980 called “the context of no context.” Candor as concealment, truth as lies, knowingness as stupidity. Making reality unreal in the service of an agenda that is so obvious it isn’t, even as the cognoscenti applaud themselves for being so smart and in the know.
The more we hear about “the deep state” and begin to grasp its definition, the more we will have descended down the rabbit hole. Soon this “deep state” will be offering courses on what it is, how it operates, and why it must stay hidden while it “exposes” itself.
Right-wing pundit Bill Krystal tweets: “Obviously [I] prefer normal democratic and constitutional politics. But if it comes to it, [I] prefer the deep state to Trump state.”
Liberal CIA critic and JFK assassination researcher, Jefferson Morley, after defining the deep state, writes, “With a docile Republican majority in Congress and a demoralized Democratic Party in opposition, the leaders of the Deep State are the most – perhaps the only – credible check in Washington on what Senator Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) calls Trump’s “wrecking ball presidency.”
These are men who ostensibly share different ideologies, yet agree, and state it publically, that the “deep state” should take out Trump. Both believe, without evidence, that the Russians intervened to try to get Trump elected. Therefore, both no doubt feel justified in openly espousing a coup d’etat. They match Trump’s blatancy with their own. Nothing deep about this.
Liberals and conservatives are now publically allied in demonizing Putin and Russia, and supporting a very dangerous military confrontation initiated by Obama and championed by the defeated Hillary Clinton. In the past these opposed political factions accepted that they would rotate their titular leaders into and out of the White House, and whenever the need arose to depose one or the other, that business would be left to deep state forces to effect in secret and everyone would play dumb.
Now the game has changed. It’s all “obvious.” The deep state has seemingly gone shallow. Its supporters say so. All the smart people can see what’s happening. Even when what’s happening isn’t really happening.
“Only the shallow know themselves,” said Oscar Wilde.
11 thoughts on “The Deep State Goes Shallow: A Reality-TV Coup d’état in Prime Time”
One may consider the D-Day landings as an effort to prevent Red Army from reaching the English Channel. And Dresden’s immolation as a message to that Red Army, as was also, of course, the stated reason (Groves et al) for the Atom Bombings of Japan.
It turned into a rescue mission and the so-called “cold war”.
In this context, and in consideration of the (now evident) back-handed nazi deal with the US intel and financial actors over the loot and a buyout rescue, the nazi cadre made (the key men) made it to Spain and to South America…while their pals were made at home in Canada and the US (especially Canada).
Rehabilitation, how very nice.
Good points which cannot be made often enough.
off-guardian has a long subtitled lecture on “journalism for sale” by the late Udo Ulfkotte. I have read his book, with difficulty, but there are mysteriously no copies in English…
Withal, I do not with to steer the discussion… our host himself may want to visit the late Udo’s thoughts. And so may others…
natural news has recently expressed their opinion as to the end game…
fyi ” The deep state plot to in…” @ NN (it involves the female person H)
There is in the non-canonical but scholarly history of the US strong suggestions that there have been numerous “corrective” executive “actions” (as they say).
Meantime, in the name of emergency (the normal autumnal winds) the power supplies to much of California have been shut off for an indefinite period – thus creating a genuine emergency…
The milk’s gunna rot. With alarms inactive and people acting out of the ordinary…what could go wrongs
and, whatever this may suggest (also @ NN) “U.S. Marines reserve units activated for “emergency within the Unit..”
Ed – could not agree with you more. We are living in an Orwellian wind tunnel and it’s hard to know who to trust.
I do have a question though on Trump and his views on nuclear weapons. Was he not quoted as saying, in essence, ‘if we have all these nukes, why can’t we use them on, say, North Korea?’ I’ve never heard him utter a word about the consequences of using the nuclear arsenal. If he has then I would be surprised.
Trump really said this?
“And when he said nuclear war was absurd and would only result in nuclear conflagration,…”
“The VILE TRUMP”…..? So, Mr. Curtin, at this time in history, who do YOU think is the proper POTUS? I personally and probably many others do not think the “Orange Man” was surprised that he won the electoral college. His internal polls pointed to victory. The reaction to his win by the not so deep state tells me that in fact he is the man for the job. The “job” transcends our borders and into orbit and beyond. I’m a down and dirty Nam combat vet with Purple Heart and memories most can’t fathom. That gives me a clarity of history and the present few have. Trump is making sausage. Nobody likes seeing it made.
He’s been gathering ingredients for decades. If he can stay alive, I’m betting on him delivering a “sausage” many will enjoy. I get the impression you won’t be one of them.
Thanks for your response. I am not sure what you are saying about making sausage. Would you spell it out? If you would, I could say if would enjoy it. You may be right that Trump was not surprised at his election, but why do you think the so-called deep-state’s (or not) reaction to Trump suggests he is the man for the job? I too know history, having been in the Marines but I refused to go to Viet Nam. Pax, Ed
Another great piece of writing and sharp insights from Mr. Curtin. Thank you.
The question now becomes, what do we do about all this? Has the magic show picked up so much momentum that it’s now unstoppable? When will “we the people” finally awake from this stupor and realize that government, of any size and/or shape, has worked and will continue to work against the best interests of its subjects?
One of your best. Thank you for posting it again.
Ukrainegate, or if you will, DNCgate or Bidengate, actually goes a lot deeper than you or I had imagined. A year ago, someone referred me to the works of Albert E Kahn. He wrote several anti fascist books. One of which is The Great Conspiracy Against Russia, which details the whole sordid history back to WWI. A friend of mine dug into his work and came up with another book called Sabotage. He sent me a link from an excerpt on none other than the MaeBrussell.com website. It shows the role of the gangster/Nazi Ukrainian faction operating within the US since before WWII.
In other words, there is long standing Ukrainian terrorist streak that works still in the US and Ukraine, is intensely Russophobic and racist/fascist.
Comments are closed.