Painting A True Christ: A Review of Terrence Malick’s Film “A Hidden Life”

There’s an early scene in Terrence Malick’s masterful new film – what I would call a moving painting – where the central character Franz Jägerstätter, an Austrian peasant farmer from an isolated small mountainous village who refuses to take an oath to Hitler and fight in the German army, is talking to an older man who is restoring paintings in the local Catholic church.

Franz, a devout Roman Catholic, is deeply disturbed by the rise of Hitler and the thought of participating in his immoral killing machine.

The older man tells Franz – who has already been admonished that he has a duty to defend the fatherland (homeland) – that he makes his living painting pretty holy pictures for the culturally conditioned parishioners for whom God and country are synonymous.  He says.

I paint their comfortable Christ with a halo over his head.  We love him, that’s enough.  Someday I’ll paint a true Christ.

Malick’s “someday” has arrived with “A Hidden Life,” where the older Malick shows the younger Malick – and us – a moving picture of what experience has taught him is the complex essence of a true and simple Christ: out of love of God and all human beings to refuse to kill.

To watch this film is to undergo a profound experience, an experiment with truth and non-violence, a three-hour trial (Latin: experimentum – trial).

While Franz is eventually put on trial by the German government, it is we as viewers who must judge ourselves and ask how guilty or innocent are we for supporting or resisting the immoral killing machine of our own country now.  Hitler and his Nazis were then, but we are faced with what Martin Luther King called “the fierce urgency of now.”

Many Americans surely ask with Franz, “What has happened to the country that we love?”  But how many look in the mirror and ask, “Am I a guilty bystander or an active supporter of the United States’ immoral and illegal wars all around the world that have been going on for so many years under presidents of both parties and have no end?  Do I support the new cold war with its push for nuclear war with its first strike policy?  Do I support, by my silence, a nuclear holocaust?”

I say that “A Hidden Life” is a moving painting because its form and content cannot be separated.  A true artist, Malick realizes that what non-artists call form or style is the content; they are one.  The essence of the story is in the telling; in a film in the showing.

The cinematography by Jörg Widmer, a longtime Malick collaborator, is therefore key.  It is exquisitely beautiful as he paints with swiftly moving light the mountains and streams of the Austrian countryside, even as the storm clouds with their thunder and lightning roll in across the mountains. The ever-recurring dramatic scenes of numinous nature and the focus on the sustaining earth from which our food comes and to which we all return and in which Franz, his wife Fani, and their young daughters romp and roll and plant and harvest and dirty their hands is the ground beneath our feet, and when we look, we see its marriage to the sky, the clouds, the light, the shadows, which in their iridescent interplay of light and darkness beseech us to interrogate our existence and ask with Franz what is right and what is wrong and what is our purpose on this beautiful earth.

That question is especially focused when between the beauty comes the terror in the form of interspersed documentary footage of Hitler, his fanatical followers, and horrifying scenes of war and violence.

Like the movie, I think you would agree that we are always moving, asking, wondering, if we are not the living dead. All is now, and now is nevermore, as it disappears into the darkness behind us. The light is always pointing into the future, so we can see where we are going.  We don’t look at the light but by the light, as the great South African preacher, Alan Storey, puts it.  But what is our light?

Where, asked Nietzsche, was the lightning before it flashed?  To which the answer comes: it wasn’t.  It is its flashing. Only a doing, an act, just like love, not a thing but action.  Just like the word God, theόs in Greek, which has no vocative sense, as Roberto Calasso has pointed out in Literature and the Gods. “Theόs has a predictive function: it describes something that happens.”  God is a verb; God is happening.  God is happening when humans are happening, acting.  Only then.

“What you do (or don’t) speaks so loudly that I cannot hear what you say,” was the way Emerson phrased it.

The filmic interplay between Franz’s agonized moral dilemma, his action, and the embodiment of Christ in the natural world, the body of Christ (Corpus Christi, not the erstwhile American nuclear submarine by that name), is its genius, one that might be lost on one impatient for action and garrulous dialogue.

“A Hidden Life” is far from Hollywood. Silence and natural beauty permeate it, as if to say the only way to grasp the mechanized and conscienceless brutality of Hitler or today’s killers and grasp why some resist it, is to enter a contemplative space where the love of the incarnated world awakens our consciences to our responsibility to our sisters and brothers everywhere.

For in the silences one can also hear the screams of the millions of innocent victims beseeching us to heed their cries and intercede.

Malick shows us that the “true Christ” must be experienced as all of creation.  No divisions.  We must feel this in our flesh and blood, as does the rather inarticulate Franz, who speaks very little.  His silence, however, and the marvelous acting of August Diehl, speak volumes.  Valerie Pachner, as his supportive wife Fani, is gripping in every sense of the word, as Franz and Fani grip and grasp and hold each other in a fierce struggle to stay united in the face of the evil forces that threaten to separate them.  It tore me apart to watch their struggle, and I left the theater shaking.

In one of his marvelous essays, “A Kind of Sharing,” John Berger, writing about painting, said,

The act of faith consisted of believing that the visible contained hidden secrets, that to study the visible was to learn something more than could be seen in a glance.  Thus paintings were there to reveal a presence behind an appearance.

This could be Malick’s motto, his faith.  Or perhaps “to reveal a presence that is the appearance.”  The body is the soul.  We are the world.

When I was young and in the U.S. Marines, seeking release as a conscientious objector, I read a book by Gordon Zahn, a sociologist and Catholic peace activist, called In Solitary Witness. It was the book that first brought Franz Jägerstätter to the world’s attention.  I found it deeply inspiring to learn about someone else who felt alone in his spiritual decision to refuse to fight in war.

Unlike Franz, who had been a wild motorcycle-riding young man prone to fighting, I had tried to be an upstanding, Jesuit-educated, patriotic, Irish-Catholic boy.  Tried but didn’t completely succeed.  I prided myself on my toughness and sensitivity.  Don’t laugh.  It’s not that uncommon.

We are often strangers to ourselves, complicated creatures, even the worst among us open to redemptive change.

But as I said then and say now, war is another matter. I felt it in my soul, as Franz clearly did, even if all he could say was, “I have this feeling inside me that I can’t do what I believe is wrong.”

War is a racket, as Marine Major General Smedley Butler put it. It is waged for the tyrannical oligarchs and always kills mostly civilians.  Over ninety percent now, probably more.  Innocent people.  War is immoral.  It is not complex.  It is simple.  Like the gospel message.  Jägerstätter grasped that long ago and paid the price.

I paid no price since I was released from the Marines to “take final vows in a religious order,” which was a complete lie, something I had never mentioned or considered but which allowed them to get rid of me.  But I vividly remember the spiritual sustenance I got from Franz’s witness as I awaited the ruling, for I was unequivocally determined to go to prison before ever donning the uniform again.

But I got off easy and still feel guilty that I pocketed their lie and went my merry way.  Watching “A Hidden Life” reminded me of my cowardice.

Despite feeling “he had no one to turn to,” despite being urged “to say the oath and think what you want,” despite the advice of family and Bishop to compromise, despite the animosity of the villagers toward him and his family, despite being alone with his conscience, Franz remained faithful to his soul’s promptings. He lived forward by the light.

Malick shows us the anguish that was involved in his decision, the agony for him and his wife, who, ironically, seems to have been instrumental when they married in his spiritual awakening and whose suffering is palpable as she supports his decision to the end.  It is not easy to watch.

Aside from Franz, who remains steadfast throughout all the abuse and suffering that he undergoes when jailed by the Nazis, the viewer is not fed a simple story of good against evil but instead is invited to examine one’s own life, to ask what would one have done, to wonder whether Franz was right or wrong to subject his family to such suffering.

Even the humanity of the Nazi judge is shown when he privately tries to dissuade Franz from not signing the oath, telling him that no one will ever know of his sacrifice, that “the world will go on as before” and “someone else will take your place.”  We see the torment on this man’s face and in his harrowed hands when he is left alone after Franz tells him simply that “I don’t know everything” but “I can’t do what I believe is wrong,” despite knowing the consequences, and Franz is taken off to his solitary witness and his death.

The viewer is left to interpret the meaning of it all.  Afterwards, we hear Fani say that “the time will come when we’ll know what all this means.”

Has that time come?

In 2007 the Catholic Church declared Jägerstätter a martyr and beatified him.  The irony of making a saint out of a man whose spiritual witness was opposed by the institutional church authorities cannot be lost on a thinking person.  Long dead, safely in his grave, a monument can be erected to his memory.

Or is it a monument erected to the church itself, the church whose silence was in those days deafening?

When I was leaving the theater with the seven other attendees, a man engaged me in conversation.  I asked him what he thought of the movie.  He said only that “it was beautiful.”  I was startled and had no response, but I thought of Rilke’s words about beauty from the Duino Elegies:

For beauty is nothing but the beginning of terror, which we still are just able to endure, and we are so awed because it serenely disdains to annihilate us.

“A Hidden Life” is like that.

Near the end we see Franz and a group of prisoners sitting on a bench awaiting their turns to be beheaded by the executioner in a black coat and bowler hat.  A man just doing his job, a bored look on his face, loping off heads one by one, anxious to get the mornings work done and get to lunch.  The terror on the victims’ faces is palpable.  I felt sick.  While some prisoners struggled as they were led into the shed that housed the guillotine, Franz walked calmly in.  Malick spares the viewer the details.  All we are shown is the aftermath – a floor awash in blood.  And as I recall, the light streaming in a high-up window.

Always the light to show us the way.






17 thoughts on “Painting A True Christ: A Review of Terrence Malick’s Film “A Hidden Life””

  1. The dramatization needs inward strain. Instead of grappling with himself, as other Malick saints do, Franz stays an honorable waxwork defenselessly consistent with his own feelings.

  2. A truly amazing film which shook me to the core. Your personal reflections on the Vietnam War era bring back many memories of my own, reminding me that there always remains much to ponder regarding those “big questions.” Though I also knew my conscience would not allow me to serve, it was only a draft lottery number of 258 that made it clear “how” that would in fact play out in my life, eliminating both Canada and prison as possible life options. That one’s life and fate could literally be determined by such an immoral “lottery” conducted by our amoral oligarchy has no doubt shaped my psyche both consciously and unconsciously. And over these many decades of subsequent American military mayhem we have all watched the “poverty draft” take over for that immoral “lottery” of the past, turning the children of the poor into simply one more “commodity” to be throughly exploited.

    1. Gary,

      I escaped the “lottery draft” as well, though I didn’t have your luck with numbers. Mine was 35. I was in the university cafeteria when I got the news and thought, “I hope I can escape somewhere”. I made plans for Canada with the help of some friends, wrote a letter to my parents, and prepared for the worst. Then, magically, my file disappeared. Have no idea how that happened, though I have suspicions my father somehow intervened, even though he was a decorated veteran. I finished my studies and, apart from time spent working ranches in Wyoming and Montana, left the country, and have been leaving it for most of my life. I now live abroad and can’t believe what is happening these days.

      1. Since we’re doing the lottery, my number – 92 – was high enough to get me past an early February birthday. This was after having refused induction, gone to trial, and – lo and behold! – winning on a technicality. I had tried going to Canada; they wouldn’t let me in (and I have no intention of ever setting foot in that USA outpost). I was prepared to go to jail. After the trial, the judge (enraged that legally he had to acquit me) said I should again be inducted with all due haste. Then Mr Nixon – who I will never call “Tricky Dick” – came up with his lottery. The best lottery one could ever hope to win.

      2. Steve – thanks for sharing your story. Your comment about “leaving” the country for “most of my life” strikes home. I grew up somehow never really feeling “at home” in America. However, even with very limited French language skills I found that I felt much more rooted and – “at home” – while living recently for three years in rural France than I ever have in the U.S. My wife and I are back in the U.S. now to be near and to enjoy our two youngest grandsons, but truth be told there isn’t a day that goes by that we don’t miss our life in Europe. The basic human kindness shown between people, and the sense of respect for and connection to the earth and to local “traditions” being at least several important “reasons” I think, for our love of rural France. Living in southern California now it feels like I’m watching an actual civilizational apocalypse unfolding in “real time” all around me.

    2. It is amazing, Gary, that such a “lottery” could determine who lives or dies. Pax, Ed P.S. Yes, an extraordinary movie!

  3. The information age has been with us for some time now so we can no longer get a pass by claiming ignorance about what the government is doing IN OUR NAMES . Now is the time to bold our “NO” . . . or we’ll soon pay the price in bright daylight.

  4. Thank you for all you write about. So sorely needed in these times of endless cacophony poisoning the real conversations we should be having. While I understand the silence of the general public about our endless wars, I do not understand the mostly silent family members of victims of these wars. My only explanation is that they cannot bear to think their country would be so casual about their losses and the cause is just.

    1. I don’t understand their silence either, Jim. The need to believe runs deeper than we can imagine, so I think. Thanks for your support. Pax, Ed

  5. Though climate catastrophe can be laid at our feet, not Earth’s, it’s as if Earth has taken what we’ve done and said to us “You had all of history to see how fruitless war is, yet you continue. Now I’m done with you.” And perhaps like the Biblical God to Lot, Earth might relent enough to to say “If but ten of you – or even five – refuse to participate no matter what, then perhaps I will spare you.” Would those terms keep us alive awhile longer, I wonder. Something tells me the answer is “No.”

    1. Howard,

      Then maybe we can make the numbers not five or ten but five million or ten million or many more. Pax, Ed

  6. I was writing a big, long response when it struck me that you said all I had to say and said it better than I could. So I’ll just leave it at this: Thanks, Ed, for again lifting my often-flagging spirit. There is no greater gift.

    1. Pax, Newton. I saw a chipmunk come out of it hole in the ground this morn when it was 4 degrees here in western Massachusetts. It looked around for a while before going down again. A good sign, the light is changing, getting brighter, we can see farther with every passing day. Ed

Comments are closed.